2,300 Years of Circular Reasoning
We've never independently measured ฯ at atomic scales
For 2,300 years, humanity has assumed ฯ = 3.14159... at all scales.
But we've never actually independently verified this at atomic scales because:
We're using ฯ to measure ฯ.
Like checking if your ruler is accurate... using the same ruler.
What if ฯ = 3.0 at atomic scales?
We wouldn't know. Because we're using the wrong ฯ to measure ฯ.
We've designed a test that doesn't assume any value of ฯ:
From funding to result
Total budget
Clear yes/no answer
This is Track A: Scientific Proof
Join Track A (Science) โWe're also building technology assuming ฯ โ 3.0
Rigorous experimental proof
$340K / 12 months
Build prototypes, test empirically
$750K / 12 months
If tech works: Empirical validation of ฯ โ 3.0
If it doesn't: Learn from failure, iterate
Either way: PROGRESS
ฯ โ 3.0 proven scientifically
AND
Technology works empirically
๐ PARADIGM SHIFT
Revolutionary physics + revolutionary technology
ฯ = 3.14159 confirmed
AND
Technology doesn't improve
โ SCIENCE WORKS
Eliminated circular reasoning concern
Partial improvements
OR
One track succeeds, one fails
๐ ITERATE
Refine theory, adjust approach, learn
We either revolutionize physics and technology,
or we learn something valuable about the limits of measurement.
Science advances regardless.
"For 2,300 years, we assumed Euclidean geometry at all scales.
Today, we test it.
Two ways. Simultaneously.
Science AND engineering.
Let's find out together."